Education Access Report Entire Site  

November 1, 2005

 

Debt-Management Perspectives

  

USA Funds Prevents More Than $14 Billion in Loan Defaults

  

Nevada Financial-Aid Administrators Plan for Default-Prevention Success

 

Washington Report

  

Senate Approves 2006 Funding for Student Aid

  

House Panel Recommends Additional Savings From Student-Loan Programs

  

GAO: Cost Estimates of Student-Loan Programs Omit Key Items

 

USA Funds Update

  

Newsletter Highlights USA Funds’ Initiatives to Promote Higher-Education Preparedness, Access and Success

  

USA Funds’ Fall-2005 Financial-Aid-Workshop Webcasts Start Nov. 21

 

Tech Talk

  

Loan-Delivery Enhancements Benefit Schools and Lenders

  

Correction

 

Operations Bulletin

  

Dear Colleague Letter Addresses Variety of Questions

  

Frequently Asked Question: Overlapping Academic Years

 

About USA Funds Education Access Report

Archive

Subscribe

USA Funds Home

GAO: Cost Estimates of Student-Loan Programs Omit Key Items

The U.S. Government Accountability Office has confirmed that estimates of the federal budget costs of the Federal Family Education Loan Program and William D. Ford Direct Loan Program fail to include key factors. In a report, “Challenges in Estimating Federal Subsidy Costs,” the GAO notes that the following factors are excluded from the budget estimates of loan-program costs:

  • Federal administrative expenses.
  • Some costs of the risks associated with lending money over time.
  • Federal tax revenues generated by both loan programs.

The GAO also reports that, while some original estimates predicted net gains to the government from direct loans, subsequent re-estimates project a net cost instead.

The GAO report cautions policy-makers that “decisions made in the short term on the basis of these estimates can have long-term repercussions for the fiscal condition of the nation.”

The GAO also notes that assessing the total costs and benefits of the two loan programs would require consideration of factors in addition to federal budget costs, including:

  • Costs incurred by schools in operating the loan programs.
  • Quality of services provided to schools and borrowers.
  • Benefits to society and individuals from postsecondary education.